Cham Swiss Properties AG’s (VTX:CHAM) biggest owners are retail investors who got richer a
January 25, 2026
-
The considerable ownership by retail investors in Cham Swiss Properties indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
-
A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 53% ownership
-
Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Cham Swiss Properties AG (VTX:CHAM), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 40% to be precise, is retail investors. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
As a result, retail investors were the biggest beneficiaries of last week’s 7.1% gain.
Let’s take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Cham Swiss Properties.
View our latest analysis for Cham Swiss Properties
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it’s included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
We can see that Cham Swiss Properties does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company’s stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can’t rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Cham Swiss Properties, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
Cham Swiss Properties is not owned by hedge funds. BURU Holding AG is currently the largest shareholder, with 30% of shares outstanding. Implenia AG is the second largest shareholder owning 14% of common stock, and Annelies Buhofer holds about 8.7% of the company stock. Annelies Buhofer, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
We can report that insiders do own shares in Cham Swiss Properties AG. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own CHF105m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
With a 40% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Cham Swiss Properties. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 30%, of the company’s shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it’s hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
Public companies currently own 14% of Cham Swiss Properties stock. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.
It’s always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Cham Swiss Properties better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example – Cham Swiss Properties has 3 warning signs (and 2 which make us uncomfortable) we think you should know about.
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Terms and Privacy Policy
Search
RECENT PRESS RELEASES
Related Post
