Costa Rica’s new Minister of Environment and Energy, Mónica Navarro del Valle, is taking office with a familiar challenge: defending the country’s green reputation while trying to repair strained ties between MINAE and environmental organizations.

Navarro was named to lead the Ministry of Environment and Energy under President Laura Fernández’s new administration, replacing Franz Tattenbach, who left office after a term marked by sharp criticism from conservation groups over SETENA, Gandoca-Manzanillo, Crucitas and broader environmental policy.

Her appointment has drawn a mixed response. Some environmentalists see her arrival as a chance to reset relations after years of tension. Others view it as a sign that the Fernández administration will continue the same approach taken under former President Rodrigo Chaves and Tattenbach.

Silvia Matamoros, secretary of Apreflofas Costa Rica, said Navarro’s main task will be to put the country’s environmental policy “back on track” and restore authority to MINAE after what she described as a weakened period under Tattenbach. “Mónica has the mission of getting this country’s environmental policy back on track, of giving MINAE back the teeth it lost under Franz Tattenbach’s leadership during the previous administration,” Matamoros said.

She added that MINAE employees need motivation, resources and institutional support to protect Costa Rica’s natural resources. Matamoros pointed to the “Comején” case at SETENA, the controversy surrounding the Gandoca-Manzanillo Wildlife Refuge, and the unresolved situation at Crucitas as examples of the problems Navarro will inherit.

“We hope that Mónica possesses the skills that Minister Tattenbach clearly lacked in order to restore this country’s former environmental leadership,” Matamoros said. The Costa Rican Federation for Nature Conservation, FECON, took a harsher position. Henry Picado, a spokesperson for the group, said Navarro’s appointment suggests continuity rather than change.

“The appointment of Mónica Navarro del Valle as Minister of the Environment is a sign that the policies initiated by Franz Tattenbach will continue,” Picado said. FECON questioned Navarro’s ties to the real estate sector and said it did not understand why she had been chosen for such an important environmental post. Picado argued that the Chaves administration weakened environmental protections, put state forest heritage at risk and promoted policies that harmed protected areas, including Gandoca-Manzanillo.

Navarro’s professional background is one reason the reaction has been so divided. Semanario Universidad reported that she is an attorney who has advised SETENA and PROCOMER on environmental regulation, while also representing private-sector interests in real estate and infrastructure bodies, including the Consejo de Desarrollo Inmobiliario and the Consejo Nacional de Concesiones.

According to the same report, Navarro has more than 20 years of experience in environmental matters, public procedure review and process simplification. Her résumé includes work tied to the expansion of Cocos Island National Park, environmental regulation for SETENA, the Single Investment Window at PROCOMER, the United Nations Development Programme and energy-sector planning within MINAE.

The MarViva Foundation offered a more hopeful response. Katherine Arroyo, the organization’s executive director, described Navarro’s appointment as an opportunity to strengthen environmental management, particularly in marine protection, coastal ecosystems and local territories.

“We value her experience and hope that her leadership will strengthen interagency coordination and collaborative efforts in support of the country’s conservation and sustainable development,” Arroyo said. MarViva also said it is willing to provide technical support so the coming years can bring progress for Costa Rica’s seas.

For Navarro, the first test will be credibility. Costa Rica still markets itself globally as a conservation leader, but the new minister enters office at a time when environmental groups are watching closely for signs of either a policy shift or a continuation of the previous administration’s agenda.

Her supporters point to her technical experience and knowledge of environmental regulation. Her critics point to her private-sector background and the unresolved environmental conflicts she now inherits.

The result is a cautious opening chapter for Costa Rica’s new environment minister: welcomed by some as a possible bridge-builder, rejected by others as a symbol of continuity, and now responsible for proving what direction MINAE will take under the Fernández government.