Federal Judge Orders Trump Administration to Restore Environmental Grant Funding
May 19, 2025
A federal judge said Monday he would order the Trump administration to restore $176 million granted by Congress to 13 nonprofit groups and six municipalities nationwide.
The decision by Judge Richard Gergel, a U.S. District Court judge for the District of South Carolina, represents one of the first final judgments in a case challenging the Trump administration, as it has fired employees, frozen funding and dismantled agencies, according to the Southern Environmental Law Center. The organization, along with the Public Rights Project, filed the case on behalf of the nonprofits and municipalities from Baltimore to San Diego. The affected groups received funding for climate and environmental work through the Inflation Reduction Act and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act during the Biden administration, as well as through separate federal programs.
“This is a huge victory for us today,” said Kym Meyer, litigation director at the Southern Environmental Law Center and lead attorney on the case. She said the order would set an important precedent and characterized the decision as “a ruling that reaffirms that the executive branch doesn’t have the authority to disregard Congress.”
Get Inside Clean Energy
Today’s Climate
Twice-a-week
A digest of the most pressing climate-related news, released every Tuesday and Friday.
Get Today’s Climate
Breaking News
Daily
Don’t miss a beat. Get a daily email of our original, groundbreaking stories written by our national network of award-winning reporters.
Get Breaking News
Gergel announced his decision during a hearing in Charleston that came after the Trump administration, in a filing Friday, said it would concede to the plaintiffs’ claims on 32 of the 38 grants. The judge said he would enter a final judgment calling on the administration to restore the funding immediately. The order was expected within a few days. Despite the administration’s concessions, its attorneys indicated they planned to appeal over jurisdictional concerns.
In their initial complaint, the plaintiffs had claimed that the executive orders freezing the grant funding represented an “unlawful interference by the executive branch” and also violated the First Amendment, which protects free speech. Two additional groups later were added as plaintiffs to the litigation. The plaintiffs said they were forced to furlough employees and pause programs supporting farmers, communities and public health.
Among the executive orders the litigation cited was “Unleashing American Energy,” intended to stop money designated under the IIJA and IRA, which provided historic funding for climate change and clean energy initiatives. The other orders were “Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing” and “Implementing the President’s ‘Department of Government Efficiency’ Cost Efficiency Initiative.”
The 32 grants affected by the judge’s decision Monday were awarded under the IIJA and IRA. The other grants were provided under a Department of Agriculture program called Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities, which was cancelled in April over concerns about inefficient spending and alignment with Trump administration priorities. The Southern Environmental Law Center said it would continue to work to restore this funding.
In addition to the president, the litigation named as defendants several administration leaders and departments, including the Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the U.S. Department of Transportation and the Trump initiative to slash spending, the Department of Government Efficiency. The EPA and USDA declined to comment on the pending litigation. The Department of Transportation and Department of Justice did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
About This Story
Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.
That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.
Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.
Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?
Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.
Thank you,
Amy Green
Reporter, Florida
Amy Green covers the environment and climate change from Orlando, Florida. She is a mid-career journalist and author whose extensive reporting on the Everglades is featured in the book MOVING WATER, published by Johns Hopkins University Press, and podcast DRAINED, available wherever you get your podcasts. Amy’s work has been recognized with many awards, including a prestigious Edward R. Murrow Award and Public Media Journalists Association award.
Search
RECENT PRESS RELEASES
Related Post
