In That Case: Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado (Video)

September 30, 2025


ARTICLE


30 September 2025

W

WilmerHale


Contributor


WilmerHale provides legal representation across a comprehensive range of practice areas critical to the success of its clients. With a staunch commitment to public service, the firm is a leader in pro bono representation. WilmerHale is 1,000 lawyers strong with 12 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia.



Explore Firm Details


In the Public Interest is excited to continue In That Case, its third annual miniseries examining notable decisions recently issued by the US Supreme Court.


United States
Environment


To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In the Public Interest is excited to continue In That Case, its
third annual miniseries examining notable decisions recently issued
by the US Supreme Court. In the final episode of this year’s
series, guest host Daniel Volchok speaks with WilmerHale Partner
and Co-Chair of the firm’s Energy, Environment and Natural
Resources Practice and its Native American Law Practice Tommy
Beaudreau about Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle
County, Colorado. The case centers on the scope of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and the ways regulators assess and
approve highways, pipelines, and other federal infrastructure
projects.

Together, they explore the history that led to this case, with
Beaudreau providing context for NEPA’s original purpose and
goals when it was enacted in 1970. Volchok and Beaudreau also
discuss the potential impact this decision will have on the future
of permitting and the role it plays in larger bipartisan efforts to
effect permitting reform.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.

 

Search

RECENT PRESS RELEASES

Go to Top