Has the North Sea tanker collision caused any pollution? How would we know? Jed Thomas 

The recent collision between the oil tanker Stena Immaculate and the container ship Solong in the North Sea has reignited concerns over the environmental risks posed by jet fuel.  

While the immediate danger of a catastrophic oil spill appears to have been narrowly avoided, the incident has left lingering questions about the long-term impact on marine ecosystems, protected areas, and the regulatory failings that may have contributed to the crash. 

How does jet fuel affect the marine environment? 

The Stena Immaculate was carrying 220,000 barrels of jet fuel at the time of the collision.  

While early assessments suggest that much of the leaked fuel may have evaporated due to the fire, the extent of its release remains uncertain. Jet fuel, unlike crude oil, is highly volatile and disperses more rapidly.  

However, even short-term exposure can be highly toxic to marine organisms, particularly fish and plankton, which form the base of the marine food chain. 

The collision occurred near sensitive marine habitats, including the Holderness and Southern North Sea Marine Protected Areas (MPAs).  

These areas provide critical breeding grounds for seabirds, as well as habitats for porpoises, seals, and various fish species.  

Even a limited fuel spill can contaminate food sources, disrupt breeding cycles, and cause long-term degradation of these ecosystems. 

Moreover, air quality monitoring is ongoing, with early reports indicating no immediate risk to human health.  

However, environmental organizations, including Greenpeace and WWF, have warned that secondary effects, such as chemical contamination from burnt residues and firefighting substances, could still pose a significant ecological threat. 

Potential for a broader disaster 

One of the greatest fears surrounding this incident was the potential for a large-scale oil spill. Given that the Solong remained on fire for days after the collision, the risk of structural failure and further pollution was considerable.  

Additionally, initial reports suggested the cargo ship was carrying sodium cyanide, a highly toxic chemical. Although later clarified that the containers were empty, the mere presence of such hazardous substances highlights the risks associated with transporting dangerous materials through ecologically sensitive regions. 

If you’re interested in monitoring cyanide in water, we are hosting a webinar in March to explore an innovative, new standard method. Register for free today!

Regulatory and safety concerns 

Investigations into the incident have revealed serious concerns regarding the safety standards of the Solong.  

The vessel had previously failed safety inspections due to steering-related issues and inadequate alarm systems.  

Such deficiencies raise pressing questions about enforcement mechanisms within the shipping industry and whether regulatory agencies are adequately overseeing high-risk vessels. 

Additionally, the collision occurred under conditions of dense fog, which may have impaired visibility.  

However, data suggests that the Solong was traveling at 16 knots and made no apparent attempt to alter its course before impact.  

Experts have speculated that autopilot failure or human error could have played a role, while some have raised concerns about possible foul play, given the military connection of the Stena Immaculate. 

How is the clean-up effort of the North Sea tanker collision going? 

Authorities have mobilized counter-pollution response teams to monitor the affected waters and assess potential fuel dispersion.  

The Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA) has assured the public that salvage operations are underway and that containment measures will be deployed as necessary. 

Marine conservation organizations continue to push for transparent and coordinated action to mitigate the damage.  

In addition to immediate response efforts, long-term monitoring will be crucial to evaluating any delayed ecological impacts. The unpredictability of ocean currents means that pollutants could spread widely, affecting areas beyond the immediate crash site. 

Monitoring equipment and pollution assessment 

To accurately assess pollution levels and track its spread, a range of monitoring equipment is necessary: 

• Aerial surveillance drones: Equipped with high-resolution cameras and thermal imaging, drones can provide real-time aerial assessments of oil slicks and pollutant dispersion patterns. 

• Satellite remote sensing: Satellite imagery helps detect oil spills and their movement over time, providing a macro view of the affected region. 

• Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs): These robotic submarines are equipped with sensors to detect hydrocarbon concentrations and monitor water quality at various depths. 

• Oil spill detection buoys: Floating buoys equipped with hydrocarbon sensors can track changes in water contamination over extended periods. 

• Water sampling and laboratory analysis: Direct water samples taken from different locations and depths allow scientists to assess contamination levels and detect hazardous compounds such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). 

• Air quality sensors: Deployed both onshore and offshore, these sensors measure volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and other airborne pollutants resulting from fuel evaporation and combustion. 

• Marine biological monitoring: Tracking changes in marine species populations and behavior can provide early warning signs of ecosystem disruption. 

Comprehensive monitoring efforts must be sustained for months, if not years, to fully understand the environmental consequences of the incident.  

Coordination between scientific agencies, environmental organizations, and government bodies will be key to ensuring an effective response. 

What can we learn from the North Sea tanker collision? 

This incident underscores the persistent dangers posed by fossil fuel transportation. Despite stringent safety protocols, ship collisions, oil spills, and chemical leaks remain ever-present risks.  

As climate change intensifies and global trade increases, the urgency of shifting toward cleaner energy alternatives and stricter maritime regulations becomes even more apparent. 

The North Sea collision is a stark reminder that our reliance on oil comes with inherent dangers—not just in extraction and consumption but in its transportation.  

Further reading: 

Ohio Train Derailment: Which Toxic Chemicals Were Released and How Dangerous Are They?

On Friday 3rd February, a 150-car freight train operated by Norfolk Southern was derailed outside of East Palestine, Ohio, a small village town of just 5,000 residents. It’s been reported that ab… Read More