State marijuana revenue is declining in Alaska.

Businesses are closing. Licenses are going unrenewed. Wholesale prices have collapsed. Nearly a decade after voters replaced an illicit market with a regulated one, the system they created is now under real economic pressure.

In 2014, Alaskans voted to replace an illicit marijuana market with a tightly regulated system. The state built one of the most structured regulatory systems in the country. Cannabis businesses operate under strict licensing, seed-to-sale tracking, laboratory testing and age-restricted retail sales.

All cannabis businesses in Alaska are locally owned small businesses. These entrepreneurs invested in a system designed to bring cannabis commerce into the light and replace illicit markets with regulated businesses operating under state oversight.

That system has worked.

Legalization has largely replaced unregulated commerce with a transparent market built on accountability and consumer safety. It created jobs across cultivation, manufacturing, retail and laboratory testing, while also supporting a wide range of ancillary Alaska businesses including construction, transportation and utilities. It also generated meaningful public revenue supporting education, treatment programs and Alaska’s general fund.

State forecasts already show marijuana tax revenue declining from roughly $26 million in fiscal year 2025 to about $24 million by fiscal year 2027. Industry projections suggest the drop could be even steeper as licenses disappear and operators exit the market.

A shrinking legal market does not reduce cannabis consumption. It simply pushes more activity back into unregulated channels.

The cause is not declining demand. Alaskans are still buying cannabis.

The problem is that the economic structure supporting the legal market no longer reflects current market conditions.

When Alaska designed its marijuana tax system, wholesale cannabis prices were far higher than they are today. The state adopted a cultivation-based tax structure that made sense early in legalization. But prices have since fallen dramatically as the market matured.

The result is a system that increasingly burdens licensed producers, while illicit sellers operate entirely outside Alaska’s regulatory framework. In practice, much of that tax burden is ultimately borne by consumers through higher retail prices, making regulated products less competitive with unregulated alternatives.

At the same time, marijuana businesses face licensing fees that exceed the cost of regulating the industry. A recent legislative audit of the Alcohol and Marijuana Control Office found marijuana licensing fees generate more revenue than required to operate the program. In effect, licensed cannabis businesses are paying more than the cost of their own regulation.

These pressures are compounded by competition from intoxicating products that exist outside Alaska’s regulated cannabis system.

Congress recently moved to close a loophole in the 2018 Farm Bill that allowed intoxicating hemp-derived products to be sold nationwide. Alaska had already addressed this issue in 2023 by prohibiting chemically converted THC products under state regulation. Yet intoxicating hemp-derived products continue to circulate in Alaska’s marketplace, competing against licensed cannabis businesses that must comply with testing, tracking and age restrictions.

Federal reforms may eventually bring greater clarity, but Alaska cannot rely on Washington to stabilize its regulated market.

The tools to address these issues already exist at the state level.

The Alaska Legislature has the authority to modernize the state’s cannabis tax structure so it reflects current market realities and allows licensed businesses to compete with illicit sellers. Lawmakers can also ensure that licensing fees align with the actual cost of regulation rather than exceeding it. Maintaining a stable legal market also protects a predictable revenue stream for the state at a time when Alaska’s fiscal outlook remains uncertain.

These changes are not about expanding cannabis. They are about protecting the regulated system voters already approved.

Alaska demonstrated that a tightly regulated cannabis market can operate responsibly. But regulation only works if the legal market itself survives. When licensed businesses disappear, the rules designed to protect consumers and communities lose their force.

Alaska built a responsible cannabis system. Without policy adjustments, the regulated system Alaskans voted for will continue to shrink while unregulated markets grow.

Trevor Haynes is president of the Alaska Marijuana Industry Association.

• • •

The Anchorage Daily News welcomes a broad range of viewpoints. To submit a piece for consideration, email commentary(at)adn.com. Send submissions shorter than 200 words to letters@adn.com or click here to submit via any web browser. Read our full guidelines for letters and commentaries here.