Your WhatsApp messages might not be as private as advertised. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton just filed suit against Meta and WhatsApp, claiming the company can access “virtually all” private communications despite marketing the app as fully encrypted. The lawsuit argues this represents a massive deception—promising ironclad privacy while maintaining backdoor access to your most personal conversations.

Internal sources claim Meta employees can bypass encryption protections.

The Texas case builds on whistleblower reports from a now-closed federal investigation. A Commerce Department memo allegedly stated there was “no limit” to the types of WhatsApp messages Meta could view through internal tools. These claims echo separate class-action lawsuits alleging employees and third-party contractors have “broad access” to supposedly encrypted chats via backdoors in the app’s code.

Company categorically denies any ability to read encrypted messages.

Meta’s response couldn’t be clearer: “WhatsApp cannot access people’s encrypted communications and any suggestion to the contrary is false,” a company spokesperson declared. Meta spokesman Andy Stone took to social media calling the allegations “untrue,” insisting the company has zero ability to read users’ encrypted messages. The tech giant promises to fight the suit aggressively, defending what it calls a “strong record on protecting people’s messages.”

Texas seeks injunctions and hefty fines in consumer protection case.

This isn’t just another legal slap on the wrist. Texas filed under the state’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act, seeking up to $10,000 per violation—potentially astronomical damages given WhatsApp’s user base. The lawsuit demands a permanent injunction preventing Meta from accessing Texans’ messages without explicit consent. Consider the precedent: Texas secured a $1.375 billion settlement from Google last year over privacy violations, proving the state’s willingness to extract massive penalties from Big Tech.

Your trust in encrypted messaging hangs in the balance. If Texas prevails, Meta might face fundamental changes to how it describes—and implements—privacy protections. Win or lose, this case signals that state attorneys general are done accepting Big Tech’s privacy promises at face value, potentially reshaping how platforms handle your most sensitive communications.