Virtus Investment Partners (VRTS) has quietly slid this year, with shares down about 26% year to date and over 30% in the past year, raising questions about what the market is pricing in.

See our latest analysis for Virtus Investment Partners.

That slide has left Virtus trading at about $161.79 per share, and with a 1 year total shareholder return of negative 31.12% and 3 year total shareholder return of negative 5.73%, momentum looks like it is fading rather than stabilising.

If Virtus has you reassessing where capital is working hardest, it could be worth scanning fast growing stocks with high insider ownership as a way to uncover the next set of compelling ideas.

With earnings under pressure, but the share price already sharply lower and trading below some valuation estimates, investors now face a key question: Is Virtus a mispriced value play, or is the market already discounting modest future growth?

On a price-to-earnings ratio of 8x, versus a much richer backdrop for peers, Virtus looks optically cheap at its last close of $161.79.

The price-to-earnings ratio compares the current share price with the company’s earnings per share, giving a sense of how much investors pay for each dollar of profit. For an investment manager like Virtus Investment Partners, where profitability and fee resilience matter more than rapid top line expansion, the P/E is a useful shorthand for how the market values its earnings stream.

Here, Virtus trades on 8x earnings while similar companies average around 22x. This suggests the market is heavily discounting its profit power and future prospects rather than rewarding its recent 14.2% earnings growth and improving net margins. Given our DCF work also indicates the shares trade 21.6% below an estimated fair value of $206.37, the low multiple reinforces a picture of a business priced for declining revenues and modest long term growth, not for a recovery in profitability.

Against the broader US Capital Markets industry, where the average P/E sits near 25x, Virtus’s 8x multiple stands out as deeply compressed. This implies that investors are assigning it one of the steeper valuation haircuts in its peer group despite high quality earnings and a forecast return on equity of 21.6% in three years.

See what the numbers say about this price — find out in our valuation breakdown.

Result: Price-to-Earnings of 8x (UNDERVALUED)

However, softer revenue trends and any further derating of asset managers if markets weaken could quickly undermine the case for multiple expansion.