Key messages:

• Bitcoin, known for its philosophical resilience and decentralization, also offers a specialized “no-internet” ecosystem.
• This means that connectivity blackouts, such as those imposed by the government in Iran right now, can be circumvented via Bitcoin. 
• For end users, the result is continuity and the assurance that Bitcoin’s ledger keeps moving regardless of internet availability and political developments. 

‍

In a modern economy, cutting connectivity is one of the fastest ways to regain control. When governments shut down the internet, they’re not just restricting communication, they’re also disrupting access to money. That’s exactly what’s unfolding right now in Iran, where nationwide internet blackouts have followed widespread protests. Banks struggle to operate, payment apps go dark, and exchanges disappear from screens. 

Bitcoin reacts differently. Not because it magically ignores reality, but because it was built to withstand environments where access is fragile and trust in institutions is optional. At its core, Bitcoin doesn’t live inside a single network, server, or country. If you hold your private keys, your money still exists even when the internet doesn’t. Ownership doesn’t depend on a bank login, a payment processor, or permission from anyone else. That alone already sets it apart from the traditional financial system.

But a standout feature of Bitcoin is that the network can still function, even under extreme constraints. The Bitcoin blockchain is continuously broadcast via satellite, with the Blockstream Satellite network acting like a one-way radio broadcast beaming the entire ledger from space, so that anyone with basic equipment can stay synced without a local internet connection. Transactions can even be prepared and signed entirely offline, with users relaying the tiny amount of data required through alternative channels like radio, mesh networks, or SMS to reach the global network.

In times of authoritarian crackdown, Bitcoin shifts its focus from frictionless payments to continuity. It offers a financial system with no central switch to flip. In situations such as Iran right now, unless they are utilizing satellite access, most Bitcoin users are temporarily limited to holding rather than transacting, but what’s key is that the system itself doesn’t stop. Funds aren’t frozen. Balances aren’t erased. The ledger keeps moving somewhere, even if you can’t always see it. 

Traditional finance, by contrast, fails fast under these conditions. Banks require networks. Payment rails require permission. Accounts are easy to block once infrastructure is centralized. When connectivity drops to near zero the traditional system simply halts. 

In times of extreme pressure, Bitcoin bends, but it doesn’t break. The cryptoasset doesn’t aim to solve every problem arising under authoritarian regimes. It simply belongs to a different category of money – one built on the assumption that rules can change overnight, institutions can fail, and connectivity can disappear. In moments of political unrest, Bitcoin’s value isn’t proven by price charts, speculation or even daily usage, but via the quiet assurance that when everything is switched off, something essential still runs, silently, relentlessly, and without needing permission.