Robert Kiyosaki, author of the best-selling personal finance bookRich Dad Poor Dad, has made another bold prediction—this time claiming that Bitcoin could hit $1 million per coin by 2030.

In a recent tweet, Kiyosaki shared his long-standing investment philosophy, emphasising asset accumulation over short-term price movements.

“Poor people focus on price. Rich people on quantity,” he wrote, highlighting that he doesn’t obsess over the spot price of gold, silver, or Bitcoin. Instead, he focuses on how much of these assets he owns.

Kiyosaki revealed that he began buying Bitcoin when it was priced at $6,000, accumulating as much as he could at the time. He expressed regret over not being able to buy more, blaming “fake money” for limiting his ability to invest further. The term refers to fiat currency, which he has repeatedly criticised in the past for being inflation-prone and manipulated by central banks.“In 2030 the probability is Bitcoin will be $1 million a coin,” he added.

His broader message was that ownership, or quantity, of assets like Bitcoin, gold, and silver is more important than following daily price movements.

“The quantity you own is more important for your future than the prices,” he said.

Kiyosaki’s views are often debated. Some investors share his belief in hard assets as protection against inflation and potential financial instability. Others remain sceptical of such high price targets for Bitcoin, citing uncertainties around regulation, technology adoption, and market trends.

This isn’t the first time Kiyosaki has made such a forecast. In April, he predicted that Bitcoin could rise above $1 million by 2035, with gold reaching $30,000 per ounce and silver touching $3,000 per coin. In the same post, he warned of a looming financial crisis and encouraged investors to consider alternative assets as a hedge.

Also Read: $1 million Bitcoin by 2035? Rich Dad Poor Dad author Robert Kiyosaki’s bold prediction draws mixed reactions from crypto experts

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of the Economic Times)